Alewife Bayou: August 1998
I don't know, maybe the Dredge is kind of a mistake right now. It's just making me want the kind of online connections and interactions I had back then, and honestly I don't need to get any more wistful and/or depressed. Still, we persevere. I can't get rid of these files until I clean them out.
detaching from myself
one august ninety eight two p m
Dreamed last night that I was entangled in some sort of tumbleweed like bit of dried brush. I was walking along a trail, at an overlook, and noticed I was dragging this thing along with me. Reached town to pull it loose. One of its thin branches was wrapped around my leg. I pulled, and it slid across my skin, being dragged into unwinding as if I was pulling it from my flesh.
But I was still tangled. Now another branch had somehow caught my other leg. Or maybe it had been tangled the whole time and I hadn't noticed? By the time I pulled that loose, my arm was tangled, and so on. I kept pulling these stems loose, and gradually I realized that the tumbleweed thing - this ball of tangles - was actually some part of me somehow which I was trying to detach from myself.
About the time I succeeded in detaching it completely, I woke up. For about five minutes I could still feel the traceries on my legs and arms where I had detached the weed. It was good.
the day the nineties ended
two august ninety eight noon
I agree with James Lileks: someday people will look back upon the day that Monica Lewinsky's stained dress was entered into evidence and say, "That's the day the nineties actually ended." The coda for a deeply weird decade, one which changed all the rules about the law, about politics, and about the media. Unfortunately it changed them without leaving instructions, and it'll take us another couple of decades or so to figure out what happened. We humans are slow.
The Boston Herald, a newspaper I don't read because of its slant (older, blue-collar Bostonians who still look at college students and think "damn hippies"), had Billy Corgan in a front-page photograph yesterday. If you don't know who that is, ask the nearest person under twenty-five. This is obviously a sign of the apocalypse.
More importantly, it was one of the two stimuli for the newest Circular Cruise, which is on liberalism and Al Capp. It's not available yet at the time I write this, but it should be up by the end of the day, so all you Monday morning folks will have an abundance of riches.
Eventually I'll dust off the Circular Cruises, but they weren't as brilliant or insightful as all that. Al Capp deserted liberalism for asshole politics. Coincidentally, so did Lileks a few years after this was written, though it's unclear in retrospect exactly how leftist Lileks was in the first place. (I've learned in recent years that a lot of leftists aren't actually left at all. Of course, my definition of "leftist" is pretty far left.) We were all very naive then, and we thought that the Lewinsky business was a cheapening of politics and a corruption of the dialogue and so on. We were not in any way prepared for what Trump would do to the place.
change of stamp
three august ninety eight three p m
Changed the stamps, making the previous comments about Australian stamps completely obsolete and befuddling. Oh, well. I really did want to use images that weren't actually stamps, so I have. The index page has information about the images; I didn't make them.
More to come later, I should think - it's a busy day in the Real World.
See the comments about the stamps in the previous set of Dredged entries.
crisis euphoria
four august ninety eight one p m
I'm getting that hyperactive feeling which always comes after resolving a crisis.
Sometimes it takes a stiff deadline or a near-disaster to get my blood pumping. I think that if I had an alarm clock which somehow managed to scare the snot out of me every morning, I'd be a lot more perky, and I'd probably get to work on time more often too. On the rare mornings when something has jolted me out of bed - once it was a car hitting our house just below our bedroom window, but that's another story - I've been able to ride the adrenaline for most of the day.
Anyway, once I solve a crisis, I still have the high energy level left over, so I get a lot accomplished if I can work fast. Right now I'm looking around, itching for things to fix, but I know it won't last, because soon I'm going to get something to eat, and the soporific effect of the food will cancel out the head-rush entirely.
The only good thing is that I came to work half-asleep, following a harsh night (emergency web project until 1:30, then insomnia), and now, after coffee and a crisis, I feel alive and awake.
Drastic, eh?
night of guided dreams
five august ninety eight eleven a m
Had all sorts of dreams last night. Dreamed I was trying to convince the members of the band Barenaked Ladies to go see a showing of "How The Grinch Stole Christmas"; being Canadian, they apparently had never seen it. Once we got in the theatre, they showed some sort of Spanish-language documentary instead, and I got really angry at the theatre owner because I had been talking so much about how great the film was and now I looked stupid.
Dreamed I showed up for work at my old job with very long hair and my boss insisted on pulling it back into a ponytail and tying it with whatever he happened to have around, which was a rubber band. I pulled out the rubber band and quit the job on the spot.
Both of these unfortunately are guided dreams, not real dreams - I was half-awake while I dreamed them, and their genesis is easy enough to trace. "Unfortunate" not because of the character of the dreams, but because the corollary is that I slept horribly last night.
i have only one symptom
six august ninety eight noon
The problem is that I have only one symptom. If I've slept too little, slept too much, or slept too poorly, they all affect me exactly the same way. So I have no idea which is actually the problem.
At any rate, I am now surviving my fourth night with something wrong in my sleep cycle, and it's beginning to tell on me. Yesterday I went home from work early because of it - it gets to a point where one cannot focus.
It's also affecting my mood. I have been reading the paper and The Economist, looking at Clinton stories and economy stories and such, and it's amazing how many of the stories are causing me to think, "Well, that's it, the world's coming to an end."
Netanyahu - this fellow has double-crossed his own party and nearly everyone else he's had an alliance with. Even his cronies don't know what his agenda is anymore. We spend so much time watching Hussein and the Iranians, and meanwhile Israel can do no wrong - although Albright knows better, but her hands are tied.
Even the most unlikely stories are triggering me right now. I read a Heinlein story once about a statistician who was tracking trends in "silly season" behaviour - fringe religious groups, flagpole-sitting, streakers, odd fads, and any other cases of temporary individual or mass hysteria. The premise of the story was that they followed a long cycle of peaks and troughs, like sunspot activity, and when the hysteria curve peaked, the economy etc always did bad things. Well, the hysteria curve is going up again. I saw an article about a teenager who streaked through the L.L. Bean store a couple of days ago. The article made most people laugh, I'm sure, but it made me shiver.
Under the circumstances, I'm not doing that Millennium Game update until I get at least one decent night's sleep.
The Millennium Game was a project to track hype, media, advertising, et cetera using the word "millennium" (in reference to the then-upcoming year 2000). Information density killed it; in 1998 it was manageable but by 1999 it clearly was not. Also, I was beginning to get seriously worried about Y2K bug (because in 1998 nobody but a handful of programmers was taking the level of danger seriously). When I lost the fourth page of updates while trying to create the fifth page, I called that a sign from above and scrapped the whole thing.

Once again, this entry is depressingly naive when viewed through the 2026 lens. You can tell how bad it is because Netanyahu is still around and still corroding the mideast with his policies, and hasn't been jailed or executed. If you'd told some of us in 1998 that he'd still be pulling this shit nearly thirty years later, we'd have either slapped your face or jumped off a cliff.
an unplanned trip
seven august ninety eight two p m
I am unexpectedly being spontaneous. I suppose if it were expected, it wouldn't be spontaneous. Anyway.
I am making an unplanned trip to Washington, Baltimore, and points south for two days, so you won't hear from me for a bit. There's a story behind this, but I don't have time to relay it now. Gotta beat the traffic out of town.
Gee, that wasn't very interesting, was it? Well, they can't all be winners.
too tired to explain
nine august ninety eight midnight
Well, I'm back, and I'm working on the tale of what happened, but it's too long and I'm too tired to finish tonight. Suffice to say that I drove for eight or nine hours, spent the entire next day wandering around on my feet, then drove nine or ten hours to come back.
The sordid story tomorrow. I promise.
rambled and rambled
ten august ninety eight two p m
The story of the road trip is posted elsewhere. I rambled and rambled and eventually decided to not distill it. So it's quite long. I apologize, but at least it makes up for my not having anything to say here.
Upon rereading it, I recognize that the middle portion, where I muse about geekiness and belonging and so forth, comes off as quite bitter. "Wistful" would probably be a more accurate term.
The story will eventually get Dredged, but not until 2005, which is where it eventually landed. To not keep anyone in suspense until then, Worldcon was in Baltimore that year and I suddenly got a wild hair to go down and attend a day of it. I talked the spouse (who was not yet the spouse, but we were definitely A Thing by then) into going. We went, we had fun, we came back, I had my usual mixed feelings about the SF community and fandom (which is the 'wistful' middle portion of the essay).
i can be tedious if i want
eleven august ninety eight noon
Today Aussie is talking about people who drone on and on and whose brains are basically feeding direct to their mouths without any intervening filters. It's not just hypersensitivity that makes me wonder if she's talking about me - we just had a minor squabble about Al Capp (she's right; I'm wrong).
She says of some conversations:
But then one finds oneself in those endless quagmires of either rehashing what's already been said or talking about stuff that is simply dull.
I worry sometimes that these postcards are like that. I do tend to return to the same orbits over and over. But then I remember that they're my pages and I can be tedious if I want.
Not that I'd want to make a habit of it.
It's true that sometimes I spew out what's on my brain and don't bother to give it a reality check. Some of the Al Capp piece was like that, hence the disagreement. [Dec 2004: However, the last couple of times I've reread it, I've decided I should have stuck to my guns a little more. One day I will have to revisit the topic.]
On the other hand, it could be worse. I have a friend who's notorious for having so many layers of mental filtering that sometimes it's hard to tell he's speaking English - his sentences come out all convoluted and alien. I understand him pretty well, but I've known him a long time and can get into his head a little. Sometimes people ask me to translate.
I may spew words at random, but I'm generally pretty articulate about it. Even in these postcards which, unlike everything else on my websites, are largely unedited.
I clearly need to go find that Al Capp piece, already alluded to once above, and reread it. (Uncle Aussie is explained in the previous set of Dredgery.)
treacly community
eleven august ninety eight two p m
Been reading some online journals, as a result of hearing from a reader who keeps one.
I note that most of the pages I read regularly could be considered "journals" in some sense of the word - that is, they're updated regularly and they mostly talk about what's going on in the writer's life.
On the other hand, I also note that online journals and news pages are the only things on the web which get updates every day, so assuming you get your news from archaic print sources (as I do), what else would you check every morning on the web?
I like the idea of a group of humans interconnected by the fact that they read each others' daily jottings. I like thinking that they eventually email each other and have conversations directly and become friends.
Me being me, tomorrow I may well think the whole idea is treacly and stupid. I am nothing if not prone to mood swings.
[Dec 2004: The rest of this referred to the sidebar "stamp" images and some other behind-the-scenes matter, all of which is now obsolete and not the least bit pertinent to the above. So I've removed it.]
The most fascinating thing here to 2026 eyes is that I apparently was not prepared to concede that I was keeping an online journal. I don't think it was because of the "I don't update often enough to qualify" reaction -- I suspect it was because I thought of them as being, y'know, here's what I had for breakfast this morning, here's how my day at work went ... because a lot of them were. (There's a little more about that below when I discuss Anita Rowland.) I didn't want to have that kind of journal. I was posting my reactions to events of the day, my allegedly deep thoughts about things, etc. The minutiae of my life were not interesting, and they still aren't. The difference now is that sometimes I think I'd better record some of those minutiae for my own reference.
it isn't like that for everyone
twelve august ninety eight noon
lanalee, dear, I have to tell you something. Please don't take this the wrong way.
Christmas isn't like this for everybody. It's your family.
Admittedly there are quite a few people who find that a period of forced confinement with the relatives is less than salubrious, and I agree that the crazed commercialism of the season is something we could all live without, but you have to understand that yours is something of a minority perspective.
I've been Up Here nearly five years now. My entire family (my entire maternal family, that is) is in the south. I didn't realize how much I'd miss them until I did. More importantly, being the family weirdo, I didn't realize how much they'd miss me.
We aren't required to bring gifts for anyone. In fact, since we're basically a poor family, no one really is expected to be amazingly forthcoming with the gifts. The important thing to bring is yourself. And your appetite, since we all like to eat and several of us like to cook as well.
My true love dislikes noise and small children - and my family has plenty of both. Yet she loves Christmas with them. She can hide in the kitchen and help my mother (who's delighted, since she usually gets stuck with most of the cooking) and everyone understands.
The trick is to have an environment where you can be honest about your likes and dislikes. Being around my family is a bad environment to keep secrets in - we're all incorrigible gossips - so everything comes out sooner rather than later. We may argue at the tops of our lungs, but we settle all disputes quickly.
So ... Christmas doesn't have to be like that. And if you really can't bear being around your family, why not just refuse to go?
I'm aware that takes a certain amount of stone-heartedness. I cannot fend off accusations that I may have a cold-blooded streak, since I haven't spoken to anyone on my father's side of the family for several years.
Still, I seldom regret that decision - ultimately it's my misery that's at stake, not theirs, and frankly I don't imagine they notice my absence much.
[Dec 2004: Wow! To my great surprise, lanalee's pages are still up. She goes by Jette now; I think I can safely breach that secret six years after the fact. After I originally posted this, she wrote an entry in reply. Note that her link to me is now obsolete, but you don't need it; you just read what she linked to.]
And in 2026, mirabile dictu, those pages are still up, should you want to go read them. Tripod has changed hands many times and the URL will redirect, but they're there. I wonder if Jette knows that. A word about Jette (who has now been going by that handle online much longer than she ever went by 'lanalee'). Jette and I knew each other -- in fact, we were a couple for some years -- well before any of this writing ever appeared on the web. We are still friends, and every so often (not as often as we'd like) the two of us get a chance to see her and/or her lovely wife in person. As I sift through these piles of ashes, it's nice to reflect on the things that do remain intact. As for Christmas ... well, my joke is that the best part of marrying someone who was raised Jewish is that I no longer have to bother with any of it. My relationship with my family in Louisiana also isn't what it once was, but that's a story for another day.
nights together and apart
thirteen august ninety eight four p m
Two days of extremely hard toil, some of it for me, some of it for my employer.
The love of my life is in some sort of company retreat for two days. However, it won't be overnight ... it's all day today and then again all day tomorrow. With the distances they have to drive (it's out in the nether regions somewhere), one wonders why they didn't just spring for a hotel.
This reminds me that in nearly five years together, we have spent - at most - one or two nights apart from each other. We may not have always been asleep in the same bed, but it was always the same house.
This wasn't really a planned thing. It just happened that way.
When Linda McCartney died, I remember a lot of the obits noted that she and Paul had spent one night apart in all those years together. I'm not sure whether I respect that or not. I think I do. I might as well have one positive thing to say about Linda; one should speak well of the dead.
I confess there are times when I want to go off and be alone, or have the whole bed to myself - it took me a year to get to the point where I could fall asleep in a bed with someone else. My solution to those times is simple. I do it. I take a long walk in the middle of the night, or hide in the back room. She understands.
As for the bed, I can always take a nap in the early evening.
We mostly haven't slept in the same bed for many years. It's not because our relationship has chilled. It's simply that we keep very different hours -- about three hours' difference in our waking-up and going-to-sleep times -- and also I am a restless, fidgety, snoring sleeper.

I've grown more charitable about Linda McCartney over the years, especially after Heather Mills made her look so much better in comparison. (Linda McCartney died in April 1998; Paul married Heather Mills in June 2002).
a tale of two houses
fourteen august ninety eight eleven a m
Mary Anne comes back from her exodus today. (See the saga of the roadtrip.) She will probably then write email to all her co-conspirators on this web project, asking why they haven't gotten off their posteriors and done anything.
Another correspondent who follows my various web antics suggested gently that I may possibly be a wee bit overextended.
It's true that do spend an amazing amount of time trying to shuffle between my many projects, most of which don't pay. But I seem to work well when overextended. In fact, I'm beginning to think that it's my natural state. If I'm not overbooked, I will take or make projects until I am. It's like water seeking its own level.
Changing the subject to something a little less internal ...
There was an article in the Globe today about an odd situation in real estate. The two properties involved are both in a single house - it's a house which was deliberately built as a side-by-side two-family home - it's bisected right down the middle. Each side has its own front door, porch, et cetera. Where I come from they call this a "duplex," but apparently that word isn't used around here. Too nouveau.
The curious aspects are: 1. both halves of the house came up for sale at the same time, and 2. the Cambridge/Somerville town line also bisects the house.
Each side is 1600 square feet and has seven rooms. Doing the math, you'll see this is not a mansion. Rooms tend to be small here.
The Somerville side sold for $340,000. The Cambridge side sold for $375,000.
Now, these properties really are exactly identical, except that the Cambridge side has a driveway, which in parking-starved Cambridge is worth about $10,000 by itself. The article was bemoaning the fact that the Somerville property is clearly just as good, and why should a Cambridge address count for more just because it's a Cambridge address? Et cetera.
Not until the end of the story, when quoting the people who bought the Somerville half, did they get to what I considered the real issue: Why are all the houses around here so expensive?
It's enough to make a future home-buyer (me) despair. (As I have before.) Do you realize what I could get with $350,000 in Baton Rouge?
It disheartens me to note that Cambridge is not only unrealistically high - and this was one of the good values, it wasn't in an especially desirable part of Cambridge - it's also pushing up the property in Somerville. I think sometimes, in my weaker moments, that I'd almost rather Somerville remained a blue-collar, high-immigrant, low-income town.
The streets would be a little rougher, but at least I'd be able to afford them.
I am sorry to say that in the intervening years, the market has gotten even worse -- to the point where it is now considered a crisis, as young people flee the state because they can't afford rent, much less buying property. Much ink has been spilled, but no one has done a damned thing about it.

"Mary Anne" is Mary Anne Mohanraj, about whom I'm thinking there will be more later in the Dredge. I'm not going to explain who she is; look her up. She's probably going tobe the only person mentioned anywhere in this little group of weirdos who has her own Wikipedia page. We've been out of touch, semi-deliberately, for many years. I am now reasonably certain the project alluded to here (and in the previous Dredge installment) was Clean Sheets. I suspect there'll be more words about that later in the Dredge too.

Incidentally, my habits have changed substantially over the years. Realizing that I really can give only one thing at a time the focus it deserves, I try to structure life so that I'm only working on one thing at a time. I do, however, still find that sometimes -- especially for my day job, where the work is not fascinating -- an impending deadline is the only thing that can motivate me. So I do still often let projects come down to the wire. As I write this, I have something that has to be finished by early June. I'll probably look into it on the last day of April.
notes from the world outside
sixteen august ninety eight one a m
On Friday, I took half the day off, put a small pad in my back pocket to work on a cartoon idea, and went out into the wide world. This turned out to be a very smart thing to do.
For at least four days prior to that, the only times I was not seated in front of a computer were when I was eating, sleeping, or travelling from one computer to another. Literally.
Lo and behold, not only did the headache which had steadily been getting worse for several days magically disappear within the first five minutes of sunlight, but I got the first story idea I've had in weeks. (Nothing came of the cartoon - I still can't draw, and no amount of sunlight will change that.)
So the motto is: Remember to go outside.
August is prime tourist season in Boston, especially tourists from overseas (August being the national vacation month of nearly all Europe.) It's always been something of a running joke how people tend to ask me for directions - apparently I look like I know what I'm doing, or maybe I just look like I'm not likely to pull a knife on them. Tourist season adds an extra layer to the joke in that I have occasionally been asked for directions in languages other than English.> I really don't know how I send out these vibes ...
The advantage of carrying a pad is that I can write down little random observations. In winter this is easier - coats have pockets - but in summer it's hard. I can't carry a purse, of course, or I would, and my shoulder bag is a little too bulky for a relaxed stroll. Fortunately these little tablets (which say "Massachusetts Turnpike Authority" on them, but that's another story) fit into the back pocket of my jeans, which means they're dandy as long as I don't sit down.
But I digress.
The Old South Church, a Historic Site ("Oh, look, dear") has its August choral music schedule out front, for all to see. First week: Fauré Requiem. Second week: Mozart Requiem. Third week: Brahms Requiem. Fourth week: Verdi Requiem. I am not making this up. If I were the parishoners, I'd rebel.
For several weeks now, the red scrolling LED sign at the Park Street subway station - the one they use to flash "important messages" - has been showing the message
TEXT TOO LONG
One wonders if the subway employees don't know how to reprogram the sign, or if they've even noticed. 2600 once gave instructions for hacking those things so you could change the message ... not that I'd advocate anything like that ...
Speaking of LEDs, I saw a child with those shoes that have LEDs built in so the soles light up every time you step down on them. Blink blink blink. I can see where this would be the height of coolness if you were eight. I really had to restrain myself from leaning down to him and saying, "Hey, those are some flashy shoes you've got there!"
He might not have gotten it, but his mother would have. I lack the courage to be a true smart-ass, thank heavens.
Remembering to go outside remains very important for my mental and physical health. More so, since I now work from home and thus spend even more time with my butt in this chair in front of these computers than ever before.
films and newspapers
sixteen august ninety eight five p m
Late Saturday night, I wrote about Friday; it therefore makes a sort of perverse sense that on Sunday afternoon I should write about Saturday.
On Saturday we went to see The Avengers. It is composed entirely of really amazing scenes which seem to have nothing holding them together, as if you've watched a collection of short set pieces without actually seeing a movie. Kymm Zuckert is right; it's not going to be a Classic. It will, however, make a great midnight movie some day.
I can't get anyone to go see Saving Private Ryan with me because all my friends think it'll be too depressing or too intense. I hate going to movies by myself. I don't have the phobia some people have about going to restaurants by themselves, but with movies, definitely.
The Globe's little fracas with Mike Barnicle is apparently attracting national attention - Entertainment Weekly printed a joke about it. That's disheartening. The paper doesn't need more bad publicity. Then again, they did screw up by not firing him. A lot of people think they chickened out. A lot of people are also saying they have a racist double standard, given that they fired Patricia Smith for fabricating columns - basically the same sin - not two months ago.
The Globe's not racist, though. Their double standard is a different one: They think that Barnicle sells papers, and they didn't think that Smith did. The irony, of course, is that many readers would have rather read Smith lying than Barnicle telling the truth.
Time to go write Stay Tuned.
My thoughts on Saving Private Ryan are further down this page. It coasts on a couple of brilliant moments, but it is undeniably a great movie ... unlike The Avengers, which looks like a worse and worse mishap with every passing year, especially if you are as deeply into the fandom of the 1960s television show as I became a few years later. I've never again watched the film in its entirety.

Stay Tuned was an intermittent column on things in advertising and marketing; it was a lot of fun and bits of it will surely surface in the Dredge.

Kymm Zuckert we shall surely discuss at some point in the near future.
various new words
seventeen august ninety eight one a m
In addition to the previous postcard and today's Stay Tuned (no Millennium Game, though I hope to do that tomorrow), today I also wrote a short story. First in a while - the Novel notwithstanding.
The story was supposed to be a comic strip (the first of several in the same weird setting). It's frustrating to see the characters and setting visually, but be unable to achieve them the most direct way.
Instead I have to tell you what these people look like - although later, when the really weird-looking characters from my standing cast of nine get introduced, that could turn out to be a Good Thing, as I have an undrawable character in there.
Meanwhile I'm not sure the transplant worked. The story is supposed to be absurdist, you understand - its pacing is very deliberate and the story doesn't resolve with a bang - but I'm not sure how well it works in the written form.
If you're interested (it's only 2500 words), have a look. Once past the disclaimer, it's the story called "Limbo Diner: Expectancy."
There's also a bio of me of sorts out on the main Alewife Bayou page. I don't generally plug my other writing this much, but it was a nice productive weekend.
Oh goodness. This is what was alluded to when someone (further up) said I might have a few too many irons in the fire at the time. Let's take them apart one by one.

Stay Tuned and Millennium Game have been explained further up this page. The former will resurface in the Dredge; the latter will not.

I was apparently working on a novel ... but at this point I'm not sure which one; I don't know whether it was the one that I eventually published (the first of three; another long sad story) or one that I abandoned.

The Limbo Diner story -- which was intended to be first of a series -- is particularly amusing for me to read about now, first, because I've completely forgotten it (I still have it, of courses; I need to dust it off and reread it and see if it's fit for rescue), and because it was originally intended to be a comic. Of course these days almost everything I do is a "comic," after a fashion, simply because I can't get anyone to read long prose. Who knows: maybe I'll read it and I'll do a comic of it.

The "bio of sorts" got moved a few times, and will appear much later in the Dredge. It's kind of an important entry in its way, so I'm sure I won't forget to mention when we get there.
elevators and fisheries
seventeen august ninety eight two p m
Wet today. Will spare you the standard rant about uselessness of umbrellas.
I work in a four-story building. Elevators have a floor that they tend to sit at when they're not actually being used. It is a continual mystery to me why the resting floor of the elevator in this building is 3. You'd think the first floor would be correct. Yes, the third floor gets the most traffic, but people generally want to ride the elevator up to it.
Then again, I may be making a mistake by assuming there was forethought behind this.
The elevator is one of the world's slowest anyway; I have routinely beaten someone from 1 to 3 by using the stairs. And I don't run.
In other, non-vertical news, this morning's Globe had an article with the amazing ecological revelation that drag fishing (where the net scrapes across the bottom, sweeping up everything in its path) destroys the sponges and critters that live on the ocean floor. Duh. I get really unhappy every time I read an article about the ecological damage the fishermen are doing - not that they're worse than certain kinds of loggers and miners, but because they're more pigheaded about it.
It seems to me like the loggers have an attitude like tobacco companies - Yeah, we know we're doing a lot of damage, but we'll never admit to it in public. The fishermen are more oblivious, as in - But there are still plenty of fish! Look! We're not hurting anything!
In fairness - when the fishermen get squeezed it's still a personal issue in this country; fishing has not been completely absorbed by the conglomerates the way other industries have. When you tell the fishermen that they can't fish Georges Bank for the foreseeable future, you're not hurting Gorton's or the men in the really big boats who work for The Company; you're mostly hurting the little guy who goes out in a little boat every morning before dawn breaks.
There are also issues with other countries cheating - it hurts to be told you can't fish in certain waters and then watch as the Japanese fish there anyway.
Nonetheless, someone has to lose. I'd rather eat bland fish-farm fish for the rest of my life than destroy what parts of the ocean we haven't already poured trash into.
Thus endeth our Tree-Hugging Interlude.
And that was before I learned about the Great Pacific Garbage Patch.
the web of shame
eighteen august ninety eight eleven a m
You want to hear about Clinton, don't you? Well, I'm too caught up in my own little web of shame at the moment. Let me unspin a bit, and then I'll see if I can't get some Clinton in at the end.
I have the same abject fear of humiliation which plagues most everybody. Maybe in the top percentile for severity. I have been known to do something embarrassing at an establishment and never, ever visit there again. I can't remember some of the joyous moments from last year, I can't remember what life was like when I was six, but I can remember every single time I've made a fool of myself since elementary school at least.
Last night I made a fool of myself - electronically - and it's a hat trick:
1. I berated someone else for something when it turned out that he did nothing wrong.
2. The matter of dispute was information which I should have already known, as a web administrator. In fact, it's so painfully obvious that it's beneath mention for most internet types - which is apparently why no one ever mentioned it.
3. Finding out this piece of information has soured me on internet security as a whole. I guess I realized before that the internet wasn't very secure, I just didn't know it. You see?
At any rate, now I have flagellated myself a little, and with any luck the gent in question will still be speaking to me today - although he'd be in his rights not to. And I did apologize. Fervently.
Which brings us to Clinton.
In case you missed Clinton's speech last night (it was quite short) and haven't been able to find the text of it anywhere (you aren't really looking, are you?), it distills to (my phrasing, of course):
1. I had an affair.
2. One reason I concealed it was to protect my family.
3. The other reason I concealed it was that I felt this investigation was a political smear campaign.
4. I never told anyone else to lie about it.
5. This Starr guy is way out of control.
Certain dubious bastions of impartiality and good conduct, such as Sen. Orrin Hatch, have lambasted Clinton for the latter, saying that the rant against Starr was uncalled for. I disagree, but unlike Hatch, I don't pretend to be unbiased.
I do agree with Hatch on one point: Clinton never apologized. I have been up and down that speech and I haven't found one thing which looks like contrition.
I commented in email yesterday that the important thing about the Clinton scandals is not Clinton's future - Clinton's almost out the door anyway - but the effect it will have on the way future presidents conduct themselves, on where the bar for public behavior is set. Remember this: Whatever Clinton has done or has not done, love him or hate him, he has consistently and steadfastly refused to repent.
This, I think, aggravates his friends and enemies alike more than the sins themselves.
I can't tell whether it means he has at least one unyielding principle, or whether it means he's so completely unprincipled that he never feels he's done anything wrong.
Here's the final word on Clinton, as far as I'm concerned. I gave up on Jon Katz a while back, but this time I think he's got it right (which, of course, means I agree with him). Kudos to lanalee for the URL.
That URL has been removed, because Wired completely changed the way they stored articles some years ago. It's probably either "Kenneth Starr as Mr. Weatherbee" or "Freedom From the Press." I can't tell you which because when I try to re-read the second one Wired pops up their "You've reached your free article limit" message (something that didn't happen in 1998) and they get a hearty fuck-you from me.

As I've noted several times in this process, this all feels so naive now in the Trump era. On the other hand, the paragraph about Clinton setting the bar for future presidential conduct now looks like one of the rare times I was both accurate and prescient.
society's codes don't apply
nineteen august ninety eight one a m
At The Institvte we have something called Zephyr which is rather like AOL's Instant Messenger or ICQ, except that there is no "click here to get your message" - it pops up right on your screen the instant someone sends it.
"Zephyr" is a good name for these messages, as they are ephemeral as the wind; if you click on it, it's gone, and unless you've done some sneaky configuration, it's never coming back again.
I remembered how to save this one, which ye spouse sent after reading the previous postcard.
You know, grumpybutt, I told you to read Primary Colors. It may be fictionalized, but I think it explains this kind of behavior perfectly.
I don't think Clinton is so unprincipled as to think he's done anything wrong, but I do think he views events from an almost sociopathic point of view - his moral code is different from that of society, and society's codes can never apply to him.
It is a genuine shame that a man of such obvious political gifts has such serious personal failings. And perhaps it is equally shameful that I think regardless of his personal failings, he probably hasn't done anything to merit impeachment.
I said I wasn't going to say anything else about Clinton, so I didn't. She did.
In the morning: A different topic.
It fascinates me which information I thought best to conceal at the time. I have changed a line above to say "ye spouse" instead of giving her actual first name. I have left in "the Institvte" even though, these days, I would cordially invite you to shoot me in the face rather than reveal anywhere on the web where I actually work. There is an enormous and deliberate wall of separation there. (It's OK here, though, because I haven't worked for MIT in a long time and the statute of limitations has expired.) As for Clinton: see comments on naivete above.
where was the watermelon?
twenty august ninety eight two a m
Okay, all you morning readers ... before you claim I didn't post anything yesterday, I did ... I just posted it at one o'clock in the morning. And now it's two a.m. Notice anything weird about my work habits?
There wasn't any writing here today because I updated other web projects instead - the Millennium Game finally got its update and it was also a mouth organ night.
That plus the staff barbecue, catered by Boston's only real soul food BBQ joint (mmmmm, pulled pork and potato salad - but where was the watermelon, eh? Can't have a summer picnic without watermelon, for pete's sake. You northerners ...) meant that I didn't do a lot of actual work today. Wrote. Ate. Wrote some more.
Tomorrow, to salve my conscience, I vow to look at nothing that isn't source code or a server configuration file. Ugh. Even if it kills me.
I do not care to go to workplace social events, then, now, or ever, but I make an exception when there's good barbecue. Sadly, my current workplace does not understand the virtue of barbecue.

This is the first mention of mouth organ (alas for coherence, properly rendered in all lower case), which was the column about sex and gender which posted on, IIRC, Tuesdays and Thursdays, and garnered some attention (probably undeserved) and led to some opportunities and contacts and so on, and which we eventually killed when the overhead and impostor syndrome got too harsh to bear. I will tell the full story of that some day when it gets Dredged, as it surely will.
the naming of names
twenty august ninety eight noon
Al Schroeder, agent provocateur, writes today about how names are important, and how when a kid reaches a certain age, he should be allowed to choose his own name, rather than continuing to depend on one that someone else chose for him.
I agree. I do happen to think the age should be a little higher than he suggests, primarily because I think it should be a ritual associated with the coming of adulthood, not adolescent independence.
Also, it'll help reduce the incidence of people renaming themselves after celebrities, and other fadlike nomenclature.
I have an unjustified cranky streak about names. (Imagine! Me, cranky!) I realize that if a name is personally significant to you, then it is, period, and no one is entitled to mock it. Nonetheless I wince when I meet a Moonbeam Starchaser or some such - and living around Cambridge I meet quite a few of them.
At least, as Mr. Schroeder notes, it's better that the person picked out that silly name for themself ... as opposed to, say, River, Rain, and Leaf Phoenix, who probably bear silent grudges against their parents. (Or maybe not ... as actors they had every opportunity to change their names, and they didn't. Maybe it's a badge of honor to them.) [Dec 2004: Although Joaquin Phoenix, who picked Leaf on his own, later reverted.]
More tellingly, I'm not allowed to cast stones ... given that I have picked a rather improbable, Victorian, and - yes - flowery name for myself, one which doesn't even happen to fit my anatomy!
This isn't because I hate my birth name ... my parents gave me three proper names, ensuring statistically that there'd be at least one usable one in the lot. It's because I dislike being what I am. So names are a tool to control what you are, yes?
My case is a little extreme, but I've seen people who took a new name because they wanted to be sexier, or smarter, or just plain different from what they were before. Or - other way 'round - because they realized that they had become something different, and their old name no longer fit.
Years back, I read Child of Fortune, Norman Spinrad's good book. (No offense, Mr. Schroeder, but I can't stand Bug Jack Barron.)
In that, the children take a "wanderjahr" when they are in late adolescence - an extended trip to discover themselves and the world. Some make their hejira with a backpack, in a state of poverty, some in high style; some take only a few weeks, some several years. At the end, they take an adult name of their choosing.
It is not lost on me that the introduction of Columbine came directly after the period when, with no job, no relationship, no place to live, and no prospects, something strange and spontaneous possessed me and I got in the car to make a twenty-six hour journey across the country from bottom to top. Several times.
I was twenty-five at the time ... but I've always been a late bloomer.
I don't use "Columbine" as much as I used to because an incident in Colorado tarnished it forever, and anyway, people didn't quite get that it wasn't originally supposed to mean the flower at all; I picked it because of the Commedia character. So later I changed to her variant spelling "Columbina," which helped avoid both kinds of confusion.

Child of Fortune has not aged well for me; when I reread it a few years ago, it struck me that there was considerably less there than I had originally thought met the eye. I have no recollection of actually reading Bug Jack Barron.

Al Schroeder was a journaller and is almost certainly no longer with us, but the name is common enough, and my memory faint enough, that searching the web to try to find the right one is impossible. I know, because I tried.
we interrupt this program
twenty-one august ninety eight noon
So ... the Globe, in its six full pages of Clinton coverage today, had a cute little side story about how Press Secretary Mike McCurry and the press corps out on Martha's Vineyard got a little surprise.
Apparently, they've been using a local elementary school auditorium as an impromptu briefing room, not that there's anything to report. McCurry comes in every day and announces what the president had for dinner, how the birthday party went, who gave what gifts - no, I'm not making this up. That's what the news stories have been like for the last few days. The man's on vacation, for heaven's sake!
You might ask yourself why the press are even down there, then, and you'd be justified in asking. I figured it was so they could get a free trip to Martha's Vineyard, one of the more overrated locations on the East Coast.
But today, in the middle of the birthday party news, McCurry was handed a memo, got kinda agitated, and said, "I need to do a very important piece of business. In about ten minutes the president will be here."
Ah, the rewards of vigilance! To the reporters resigned to non-news came the spoils - the first announcement of the bombings.
I have said five times, in various places, that I wasn't going to write about the Clinton mess again, and five times I've been wrong. It just keeps getting weirder and weirder!
OK, perhaps these bombings served a worthwhile purpose (although if Clinton's advisors think that bombing Khartoum is in any way going to soothe Sudanese relations, they need to be dismissed). A symbolic purpose, anyway. Question is, symbolic for whom? For the terrorists? For the Islamic nations? For the American people? Who will benefit from this symbol?
It gets harder and harder to like Clinton. Why did I like him this long anyway? Why do I persist?
Well ... I got an email this morning. I'm going to quote a sizable chunk of the middle; apologies to whoever originally started circulating this Xeroxlore.
It purports to be the "unedited" text of Clinton's confession speech. It starts with the admission "I banged her," but the salient part's here in the middle:
Six years ago, there was not a man, woman, or child who didn't know I was as horny as Woody Allen. But you elected me anyway, which turned out to be a good move on your part. Your other choice was Bush, an aging baseball player and part-time resident of some place called "Kennebunkport" who thought he could bomb his way into the White House; and Perot, a whining nasal-toned munchkin with his own vision of the Ivory City.
Before them there was Reagan, who left the office with the same Alzheimer's he came in with; and Carter before him who brought you a 17% prime interest rate, smiling the whole time like his lithium drip had just kicked in. It was Nixon who before that coined, but never really understood, the concept of "plausible deniability," and almost got a one-way ticket to San Clemente for his crackerjack style of governing. Johnson was an inbred, power-mad war criminal whose major contribution to American society was Johnson City and chili. And finally John Kennedy, who was a little naughty himself, who didn't hang around long enough for America to spot that curious atavistic tic for "beaver-wrestling" shared by at least a dozen former residents of the White House.
Which brings me back to my point. Since I have been strumming the Deliverance banjo here at the White House, government is doing more. The budget is balanced for the first time since JFK did a one-gun salute to Marilyn, a fact the press didn't seem to care about, evidently. Unemployment is so low today a blind felon could get a job as a night-watchman. The stock market is higher than a D-student on a full gram of dumb-dust, and anyone with a degree from a junior college who can spell "internet" has enough money to ponder the annual maintenance cost of his yacht, instead of where his or her next meal is coming from.
That was clearly written before yesterday's events. It was a lot easier to agree with, to laugh at, before then.
The problem is that I can forgive sex, lies, and videotape, but bombing someone - whether for political reasons or not - is higher up on my list of sins. One of the few ideals I cling to is that it is impossible to fight fire with fire.
After all, I didn't dislike the Republican presidents because they were Republicans - I disliked them because of their militaristic streaks. (And because of their bigoted streaks. And because they hated the poor. None of that automatically comes with being Republican, although these days it does seem to be a package deal.)
I suppose I shouldn't be surprised at Clinton. Adultery and shows of military might both spring from the same place. Clinton is a fine president - as I have noted before - except when he thinks with his penis.
I have nothing further to say here in 2026 about naivete, standards of presidential conduct, unexpected bombings, thinking with one's penis, etc. I have said all I can bear.
thoroughly worded out
twenty-one august ninety eight five p m
Have I gotten any work done today? No. Finally I gave up fighting with the server I've been trying to configure for three days, and wrote the essay on religion I've been meaning to write.
It's very long - you've been warned - and I'm a little worried about it. Oddly enough, I feel a lot more comfortable talking about my sex life on the web than my religion. The beginning explains why, a little; it's an upbringing thing.
That, plus the long Clinton piece (previous entry) which I wrote this morning, means that I'm thoroughly worded out, and I may not post tomorrow.
Oh, and I forgot to put this URL in the Clinton item. Enjoy.
The essay on religion is somewhere in the archives waiting for me to unearth it. I am a littl hesitant to, honestly.
unconstructive meta-news
twenty-two august ninety eight three p m
Sitting here listening to the live version of King of Spain by Moxy Früvous, and feeling a bit random. Ideally I should be reworking a web site I promised to fix, or working on The Novel, or doing something constructive.
Not that reading web journals isn't constructive, it's just not what I should be doing at this moment.
Web ring legislative matters: People who have followed the Thinking Aloud ring, my little experiment, may have noticed that it strands you on Diane Patterson's pages without further egress. This is because she's on the list, but hasn't dropped in the HTML yet. Give her time, it's not like it's a big problem.
I was reading my way through Dear Jackie Robinson, Lizzie's journal pages, and would probably have asked her about joining the ring this weekend. Unfortunately she has decided to stop - and I cannot fault her reasons, not that it's any of my business anyway.
Evidence shows that I am not the only person mourning.
Oh, well. Sorry about the meta-news. On the other hand, I said yesterday that I wasn't going to write anything today, so you can't complain about the quality of a bonus entry.
Thinking Aloud was a webring. If you don't know what a webring was, kid, I'm not going to explain it to you. It was run using my webring software, called Nibelung, which I maintained for years and years (until well after the heyday of the webring was over, in fact).

Diane Patterson is still around; she's mostly on Mastodon these days and does not, to the best of my knowledge, keep any kind of online journal per se.

Lizzy, of course, is Beth (whose last name I suppress here because she has never used it on the web). Beth is very definitely still around and we snark at each other regularly, though she also hasn't kept any kind of online journal for quite a while. Life ensued. It's a shame, though, because both of them were better writers than I am.
lackluster sleepy sort of day
twenty-four august ninety eight noon
Not much of an entry - I'm actually having a very lackluster, sleepy sort of day. Insomnia for two nights is probably not helping my fogginess. There's a nice random Stay Tuned from yesterday, if you're absolutely dying for words to read.
More to come, later this evening.
insomnia and warfare
twenty-five august ninety eight noon
Good title, yes? Don't bother reading the entry, just enjoy the title. Sounds too much like a Steve Vai album though.
Although I do not sohelpme intend to become your maiden aunt who is continually giving you updates on how her bursitis is acting up, whether you like it or not, I need to say a few words about sleep. Specifically, mine.
I didn't write a postcard last night as promised. When I came home from work (early) I tried to nap because I was so tired. I couldn't sleep. Angry at sitting around with my brain befogged, at seven p.m. I tried to nap again. No dice.
I have suffered from intermittent insomnia ever since I was a very small child. My body usually is willing to sleep on cue, but my brain is often unwilling to let it. The brain just keeps whirling around, Tasmanian Devil style, even while the body can't keep its eyes open. Which is nearly the state I was in last night.
Unfortunately the brain depends on the body to communicate its ideas to the world, and the body was incapable of writing complete sentences last night. So here was the brain, steadily getting more and more steamed because it had all these things it wanted to write down, and the body was having none of it. Very frustrating.
On Sunday night I finally got to see Saving Private Ryan. What an internally contradictory movie.
The first half hour is absolutely brilliant, and as good an anti-war exemplar as you'll ever see. By never giving you the long vista, the cinematographer gets you thinking in terms of very small gains - claiming the next three feet of beach, not the next thirty. Everything slows to a crawl. The noise and the camera wobble and the washed-out colors all contribute to this sense of being unable to get your bearings, being unable to find a safe place to rest where the guns can't reach you. Ultimately the top of the beachhead wasn't very far from the landing boats at all, but it seemed like miles to the men climbing it, and the genius here is that it will seem like miles to you too.
The rest of the movie is a standard heroism-and-glory war movie, with the standard characters (all of them well-acted, though) and the standard setups. It's a very good war movie - but its view of heroism and Doing The Right Thing is straight out of a John Wayne pic, and rather undermines the blood and horror of the first half hour.
The only differences is that the characters are more aware of the stupidity of what they're doing (although they do it anyway), and some of the wrong people die. Otherwise it's Sands of Iwo Jima.
Look, I'm not that rabid a pacifist. I believe there were genuine and good reasons why World War II needed to be fought, and furthermore I believe it's the last war this country has yet been involved in where I'd have no qualms about signing up.
But we must also face the fact that if I had been alive then and I had gone to war, the odds say that I would not have lived through it.
There is no way to sugarcoat the fact that so many people were knowingly sent to the shores of France by the government in order to die. There is no way to sugarcoat the fact that all wars from the end of the Civil War to the end of the Vietnam era were wars of attrition - I can send more resources and manpower, and afford to lose more, than the enemy can.
That's a lousy way to fight, whether you're the person on the battlefield or the one who has to write letters to the mothers and widows.
Of course these days, in order to avoid that messy business of our people dying (we don't seem to particularly care about their people dying), we conduct wars via drones and bombing so no boots are ever on the ground and no moral responsibility ever need be taken. Bloodshed without guilt. I can't say I like that any better.
inu dislikes lightning intensely
twenty-six august ninety eight noon
Delayed a little here because my provider had one of its fidgets this morning. In fact, it's refusing to send this postcard on the first try. But I shall persevere and triumph ...
Last night and well into early morning we apparently had a whale of a thunderstorm. Inu, the cat who owns this website, dislikes thunder and lightning intensely. When the first thunder hits, she vanishes from the window where she's sitting (if the windows are open, she's sitting in one) and hides under something - behind the toilet, in the little enclosed space made by the bottles of cleaner and other paraphenalia we keep there, is apparently her favorite. Under the bed is a close second.
I slept through the whole storm, as last night was when exhaustion finally prevailed against insomnia - I was out cold. When I finally got out of bed this morning, the rain had already stopped.
I went to the bathroom to shower and was startled by Inu, who was sitting in the middle of the floor on the bathroom rug. Now, Inu isn't fond of the bathroom unless she's hiding there. I think she regards the bathroom as kind of like a bomb shelter.
Her posture when I found her clearly implied that although the worst of the danger was over, and the behind-the-toilet duck-and-cover was obviously no longer needed, she wasn't coming out into the open until she was sure the crisis had passed.
I evicted her gently from the bathroom. For the rest of the morning, while I was getting ready to leave, she either sat plaintively outside the bathroom door, or followed me around - both very unusual behavior for her.
The thunder had been over for several hours by then. It's tricky being phobic.
Inu, of course, is no longer with us, but the web domain named for her still stands, and she still has her own about page there. I will never, never tke it down.
Wistful Thinking
twenty-seven august ninety eight eleven a m
I'm in the process of adding a new site to my little bitty webring. The odd thing about Anita's journal - as I said to her in email - is that normally I wouldn't put a site like hers on the ring. And since that is not intended to be in the least bit insulting, perhaps I'd better explain.
You see, I like sites which venture off into speculation every so often. I like woolgathering about the Nature of the Universe or the War of the Sexes or where Clinton went wrong - things like that. I like random topic drift. I like reading about someone's ordeal with voice lessons one day and the same person's speculations on solipsism the next (hi, Di!)
There is absolutely nothing wrong with journals which mostly talk about what's happening in their own day-to-day world (many people would even say that's what a "journal" is supposed to be!) I do read sites like that and enjoy them, but I tend to read them in large chunks - a week's worth at a time or more.
In Anita's case, though, the more I read, the more I felt like I was watching an alien universe through a porthole. And I must make this clear right now: This does not reflect badly on Anita's universe.
It reflects badly on mine.
I will have been in Boston for five years in October. I currently socialize on a regular basis with exactly four people: 1. my significant other 2. my best friend (who followed me up here from Lousiana) 3. another old friend (who preceded me up here from Louisiana) and 4. her fiance.
That's not a gripe exactly - I'm not looking for sympathy, I'm just stating facts.
Lest you think that I am still recovering from the change of locale, things were not much better in Louisiana. Maybe another two or three people I did things with regularly. And I had been there basically since birth. I was something of an outcast during school, and since we were all smartass kids, when high school ended we had scholarships all over the place, and we scattered to the corners of the earth. I didn't really go to college - a few furtive semesters in different places.
It's tempting, then, to blame circumstances - lack of venue, and so forth - but the truth is I am not a social animal. Or so I tell myself. Obviously there is something wrong with this picture, or I wouldn't get wistful when I read about Anita's life.
And now let us talk about Microsoft, and the Seattle area in general, for a moment. This will seem like a digression, but it's germane. Trust me.
I used to dislike Microsoft for several reasons: 1. They were a giant sucking monopoly 2. They wrote lousy software 3. Their working facilities, worker treatment, living arrangements, et cetera made me itchy.
Re the last: I felt - and had anecdotes to prove it - that Microsoft grabbed kids fresh out of college, dropped them into a quasi-communal-living situation, with an instant pool of friends who did the same things and thought the same things and laughed at the same jokes, put them at ease, and then burned them out through complete overwork - leaving them, when done, completely exhausted and having virtually no real-world job skills, having been basically moved intact from one campus to another. Joining Microsoft looked to me little different from joining a personality cult.
I still think Microsoft is a personality cult (see Accidental Empires for more on that), but just as it gets steadily easier to find a MS employee who'll criticize The Boss, so have my reasons to hate Microsoft undergone some erosion.
Yes, they're still a giant sucking monopoly, but one which is being undermined by the unmanageable size of its own organization and its own products. Yes, they still make lousy software. Unfortunately, so does everyone else - which is one reason why I'm no longer in commercial software after ten years. And although the Microsoft campus still makes me shiver a little, I'm having to rethink.
I am sitting in an immense pool of people with the same interests as I have - people whom I could probably socialize with very well, share jokes, have a drink, maybe play a game or two. I am in the hotseat of the northeastern technology corridor, in a university so incurably geeky that it has an entire class A IP address to itself. (True. You know how IP addresses consist of four numbers? Anything where the first number is 18 belongs to MIT. That's a lot of addresses! But I digress.)
Nonetheless, I don't socialize with these people. For one thing, I'm the wrong age - older than the students, younger than the established permanent residents. But mostly it's because I've been trained to shun some of the activities I like. I grew up with the geek stigma.
Perhaps ... perhaps, I think, reading Anita's site, if I had gone to Microsoft when I was twenty, and been immersed in an environment where it was considered acceptable to dissect SF films all night and play weird board games and so forth ... perhaps if I had been in a place where the stigma didn't apply, a community where even if you're not involved with Microsoft, the culture is very loose and forgiving, and technology is appreciated (unlike Louisiana) ... perhaps everything would have been different.
Would it have been better? Dunno. For all this soul-searching, I'm not unhappy with my life now. I have a good job and lots of leisure, domestic bliss, cats, and plenty of coffee. And Anita's life isn't perfect. I gather that she's looking for love ... and her jobs seem to often be temporary and changeable, something which would make me crazy.
Ultimately, I don't want to trade for Anita's life. I'd just like a little taste of it every now and then.
When I edited this entry in December 2004 for reposting, I noted "Anita carries on faithfully," followed by her journal URL. Unfortunately, that's no longer the case. Anita Rowland died of cancer in 2007, age 51.
history repeating
twenty-eight august ninety eight eleven a m
The Economist has a cranky columnist who specializes in issues of language - usage and such, like a William Safire, except instead of being a pompous pundit, one envisions a crusty old Brit gentleman of the Old School.
In fact, the columnist's pseudonym - all writers there are concealed, and in fact only the columnists have recognizable bylines at all - is "Johnson," summoning up images of that irascible biographer. [Dec 2004: Yeah, I know. Boswell was the biographer. See the next entry.]
This column is about the New Oxford English Dictionary. The New OED has changed from the strictly prescriptive approach of the original, venerable OED to a descriptive_ one, and all hell is breaking loose.
Now, I wrote about this before in some detail, and I recommend reading that if you have the free time, but in brief:
A prescriptive dictionary tells you "This usage is correct; this usage is incorrect" and basically presumes to lay down the law.
A descriptive dictionary, on the other hand, describes usage as it is actually practiced at the time the dictionary was made. It will, in Johnson's words, neither instruct nor ban. Instead it makes observations like "Most people use the word this way; some people also use it this way on occasion; a very few people use it this way."
I won't go into which is "better," because that's meaningless. It's more of a "match the tool to the job" situation. (See the essay linked above for more on that.)
What amuses me is that in the 1960's, the preeminent dictionary of the US converted from a prescriptive to a descriptive approach, and there was a huge hullaballoo. (Again, see above.) Now the preeminent dictionary of the UK - and, some would argue, the ultimate authority of English, as if there could be any such thing - has gone the same route, and the hue and cry has begun all over again.
You'd think people over there would have learned something from the fight over here thirty-plus years ago, but no. History repeating.
It is true that there's a general shortage of prescriptive dictionaries, and some will regard this as the falling of one of the final bastions. On the other hand, I can sympathize with the dictionary publishers. Although it's true that sometimes you want to be flat-out told which usage is "right" and which usage is "wrong," it takes a lot of confidence - not to say hubris - on the part of the publisher to put on the Lawgiver hat.
And of course there will always be people who dispute the rulings anyway, no matter what.
The "essay linked above" is no longer linked above because it's in the Circular Cruises and those have not been Dredged yet. One day. But you have enough here to get the gist.
definitely poor taste
thirty august ninety eight eleven p m
Oh, my goodness.
While looking up an old Bob Garfield column for this week's Stay Tuned, I found this.
Wow.
I actually think it's funny. But I agree with Garfield - it's definitely in poor taste. [Dec 2004: Alas, the column has gone behind a pay curtain if it's still on the site at all, and I can no longer remember what it was about.]
Then again, I was watching Daria all weekend so my sense of humor is definitely in the dark end of the spectrum right now.
Oh, by the by, of course I goofed. Samuel Johnson, although definitely irascible, was a lexicographer. He did have a famous biographer, of course - that little toady Boswell.
I mean, think about it. Boswell didn't do anything worthwhile except write about someone else, yet his name is in all the history books - and usually in a bio entry on Johnson, a third of it is about him. As far as I'm concerned, that's riding to glory on someone else's coattails. It's like writing about Nancy Reagan and then spending two paragraphs talking about Kitty Kelley.
But I digress.
don't tell anyone
thirty-one august ninety eight noon
Payday! The traditional celebration for payday is to have a Real Lunch somewhere. As it happens, I need to shop, so "somewhere" is likely to be The Mall. I love to shop. Unfortunately I can't buy the kind of clothes I most love to shop FOR, but that's a minor issue. At the moment my stock of T-shirts is dying quickly - some have been washed so many times that they're getting wear and tear pinholes from the brutal coin-op washing machines. My jeans are falling apart too. And since, apart from special occasion clothes, that's my wardrobe, it's time to replenish it.
Anyway, so I'm going to sneak out of work early, buy some nice food, and spend money. Sssh. Don't tell anyone.
I was going to write a little about radio, inspired by something Al Schroeder wrote, but I'll do that later, I think.
I also have a few things to say at some point about my warped definitions of fantasy and science fiction - I'm becoming aware that I don't define the terms the same way everyone else does.
And, come to think of it, I have a rant about the Myers-Briggs Personality Inventory (and its ilk) that I can feel exerting pressure on the back of my head.
But I'm not going to write any of these things now. No, I'm not mentioning them just to tease you. I'm mentioning them for two reasons: First, because I have a mind like a sieve and this way I'll remember that I was planning to write about them later. Second, because just mentioning them here will cause a few people to send me relevant and contentious email, like "So what the heck's wrong with the Myers-Briggs, eh?"
Which is exactly the way I like it.
10 March 2026